V3I9P16

Competence and Challenges of School Paper Advisers: Voices from the Field

Angeli C. Alvizo^1*, Nelia S. Raganas, PhD²

Abstract

This study explores the mentorship competence and challenges of school paper advisers (SPAs) in the Division of Butuan City, focusing on their lived experiences in guiding student journalists. Anchored on Bandura’s Self-Efficacy Theory and Deci & Ryan’s Self-Determination Theory, the research employs a transcendental phenomenological approach to capture advisers’ narratives on best practices, perceived effectiveness, and encountered constraints. Findings reveal that mentoring is both rewarding and demanding, requiring advisers to balance technical guidance with nurturing values such as discipline and resilience. Effective practices include individualized coaching, peer learning, reflective mentoring, and exposure to models and standards. Mentoring effectiveness is perceived through student progress, improved writing, collaborative learning, and competition success. However, advisers face challenges such as time constraints, diverse student readiness, limited resources, and lack of parental and institutional support, which both foster resilience and risk burnout. Suggested strategies include collaboration with experts, authentic journalism simulations, structured frameworks, continuous professional development, and administrative recognition. The study concludes that mentoring in campus journalism is a reciprocal process that transforms both students and advisers, and its sustainability depends on systemic, professional, and institutional support.

Keywords:

School Paper Advisers, Mentorship Competence, Campus Journalism, Self-Efficacy, Challenges